Impact of hydrating status on residual renal function in hemodialysis patients (first report)

  • L. Surzhko State Institute «Institute of Nephrology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine
  • V. Lubashev Odessa Regional Center of Nephrology and Dialysis
  • I. Poperechnyj Odessa Regional Center of Nephrology and Dialysis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31450/ukrjnd.3(63).2019.06
Keywords: water balance, hemodialysis, residual renal function, diuresis, residual renal clearance of urea, hydration.

Abstract

 Residual kidney function (RKF) is a powerful indicator of residual renal functional capacity that eliminates uremic toxins and fluid in hemodialysis patients.

The purpose of our study was to investigate the influence of hydrating status on residual renal function in patients with CKD 5HD.

Methods. A prospective observational study included 60 hemodialysis patients with CKD VD. All patients were examined - taken general and biochemical blood tests, determined the level of urea and creatinine in the daily urine. RKF was evaluated by urine volume, residual KT / V and KRU. Water balance was measured and evaluated using BCM-monitor.

Results.During the analysis of BCM data, hyperhydration (OH / ECW above 15%) was revealed in 15 among all patients included in the study, which amounted to 25%. A statistically significant difference between patients who were hyperhydrated and normohydrated was found in relative (OH / ECW) and absolute hydration (OH), ECW, and ultrafiltration rates. Thus, in the group of hyperhydrated patients, the average relative hydration rate was 14.3% lower compared to normohydrated patients (p < 0.001) and absolute hydration by 2.6 l (p < 0.001).

In further analysis, no significant difference between two groups was found in the indicators characterizing the RKF, namely, between the level of urine output, KRU, KT / Vren. The level of ultrafiltration in the group with normal hydration is 900 ml lower than that with hyperhydration (p < 0.005). In study the influence of indicators of hydration status such as OH, OH / ECW, TBW, ECW, ICW on RKF indices no reliable correlation of the above mentioned values ​​with diuresis, KRU, KT / Vren (p > 0.05) was found. A positive correlation was found between KRU, diuresis and KT / Vren, indicating that with increasing diuresis the KRU value and KT / Vren increase (p < 0.001). The same relationship was found between diuresis and KT / Vren, p < 0.001. An analysis of the relationship between absolute and relative hydration with dialysis efficacy (eKT / V) revealed that dialysis efficacy decreases with increase of hydratation in CKD 5HD patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusions. The results obtained in our study indicate that the indicators of hydration status at baseline do not allow to find out an influence of them on the baseline level of RKF (diuresis, KRU and KT / Vren) in patients with CKD 5HD. Issues of the influence of hydration status on changes in RKF during the observation will be addressed in the following reports.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Shemin D, Bostom A, Laliberty P et al. Residual renal function and mortality risk in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38:85-90. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.25198

2.Termorshuizen F, Dekker F, van Manen J et al., NECOSAD SG: Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialysis patients: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 1061-1070. doi:10.1097/01.asn.0000117976.29592.93

3. Jansen M, Hart A, Korevaar J et al. Predictors of the rate of decline of residual renal function in incident dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002;62: 1046–1053. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00505.x

4.Guo Q, Yi C, Li J et al. Prevalence and risk factors of fluid overload in Southern Chinese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. PLoS One. 2013;8: e53294 10.1371/journal.pone.0053294 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053294

5.Johnson D, Mudge D, Sturtevant J et al. Predictors of decline of residual renal function in new peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int.2003; 23: 276–283.

6.Ignace S, Fouque D, Arkouche W, Steghens JP, Guebre-Egziabher F. Preserved residual renal function is associated with lower oxidative stress in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant.2009; 24: 1685–1689. 10.1093/ndt/gfp077 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp077.

7.Herget-Rosenthal S, von Ostrowski M, Kribben A. Definition and risk factors of rapidly declining residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis: an observational study. Kidney Blood Press Res.2012;35: 233–241. 10.1159/000332887 doi: 10.1159/000332887

8. Liao CT, Shiao CC, Huang JW, Hung KY, Chuang HF, Chen YM, et al. Predictors of faster decline of residual renal function in Taiwanese peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int.2008; 28 Suppl 3: S191–S195.

9.  Gunal AI, Kirciman E, Guler M, Yavuzkir M, Celiker H. Should the preservation of residual renal function cost volume overload and its consequence left ventricular hypertrophy in new hemodialysis patients? Ren Fail.2004;26:405–409. doi:.1081/jdi-120039825

10. Lameire N, Van Biesen W. The impact of residual renal function on the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int.1997;17 Suppl 2: S102–S110.

11. Rodriguez-Carmona A, Perez-Fontan M, Garca-Naveiro R, et al. Compared time profiles of ultrafiltration, sodium removal, and renal function in incident CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 44: 132–145. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.03.035

12. McCafferty K, Fan S, Davenport A. Extracellular volume expansion, measured by multifrequency bioimpedance, does not help preserve residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2014;85:151–157.10.1038/ki.2013.273. doi:10.1038/ki.2013.273

13. Tattersall J. Bioimpedance analysis in dialysis: state of the art and what we can expect. Blood Purif. 2009;27:70–74. doi: 10.1159/000167012

14. Wabel P, Moissl U, Chamney P, et al. Towards improved cardiovascular management: The necessity of combining blood pressure and fluid overload. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:2965–71. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn228

15. Wizemann V, Wabel P, Chamney P, et al. The mortality risk of overhydration in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:1574–9. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn707

16. Lee M, Park JT et al. Prognostic Value of Residual Urine Volume, GFR by24-hour Urine Collection, and eGFR in Patients Receiving Dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 12:426–434,2017. doi:10.2215/CJN.05520516

17. National KF: KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66: 884-930. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015

18. Hemodialysis Adequacy Work Group: Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy, update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis, 2006; 48(1): 2–90, doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.03.051.


Abstract views: 433
PDF Downloads: 18477
Published
2019-08-20
How to Cite
Surzhko, L., Lubashev, V., & Poperechnyj, I. (2019). Impact of hydrating status on residual renal function in hemodialysis patients (first report). Ukrainian Journal of Nephrology and Dialysis, (3(63), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.31450/ukrjnd.3(63).2019.06
Issue
No 3(63) (2019): Ukrainian Journal of Nephrology and Dialysis
Section
Original Papers