Technetium-99m-MIBI-SPECT for prostate cancer diagnosis
Abstract
The gold standard method for prostate cancer diagnosis is a transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy. The detection rate of prostate cancer using the biopsy is approximately 25-30%. A non-invasive method Technetium-99m methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile single-photon emission computed tomography (technetium-99m-MIBI-SPECT) could be used in prostate cancer detected.
The study aimed to try to show that Tc99m-MIBI-SPECT, which is performed as a non-invasive method before biopsy in patients with prostate biopsy indication, may prevent unnecessary biopsy among these patients.
Methods. Fifty-six patients who were admitted to our clinic for any lower urinary tract symptoms or routine control and who had a digital rectal examination or PSA value indication for prostate biopsy were included in this retrospective study. Technetium-99m-MIBI-SPECT our patients before the biopsy was performed, radiopharmaceutical uptake by the intensity and localization of the prostate was detected. Technetium-99m-MIBI-SPECT localization and intensity of involvement by prostate biopsy results were evaluated by nuclear medicine specialists.
Results. The patients’ age and PSA level were 62.8 (31-78) years and 11.3 (2.5-100) ng/ml, respectively. Prostate cancer was detected in 27/56 (48.2%) patients. The suspicious diagnosis in technetium-99m-MIBI-SPECT images was observed in 36/56 (64.3%) patients, but prostate cancer was detected in 20 of them only. The sensitivity and specificity of technetium-99m-MIBI-SPECT were 74% and 45%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 55% and 45% respectively. The diagnostic value of technetium-99m-MIBI-SPECT methods was considered as 58%.
Conclusıon: The technetium-99m-MIBI-SPECT method in this study had low sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer diagnosis. Therefore, we came to the conclusion that technetium-99m-MIBI-SPECT cannot be an alternative diagnostic method.
Downloads
References
Divrik R. Türkiye’de prostat kanseri insides [Internet]; 2008. Available from: www.uroonkoloji.org/ files/prostat.pdf. [In Turkish].
Whingo PA, Tong T, Bolden S. Cancer statistics. CA CancerJ Clin, 1995;(45):8-30.
Dillioğlu Ö, Çevik İ, Üroonkoloji 1: Ankara, Ertem Basım Yayın, 2007; 610-630. [In Turkish].
Esen M, Kocakoç E. Prostat kanseri tanısında difüzyon ağırlıklı MR ve dinamik kontrastlı MR'ın yeri. Fırat Üniversitesi / Tıp Fakültesi / Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı 2010. [In Turkish]. Available from: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Karataş D, Bakır Z. Prostat glandı benign ve malign lezyonları ayrımında difüzyon MR bulguları ile prostat biyopsi sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi / Tıp Fakültesi / Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı 2012. Available from: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp















